Abstract

For the first time, an analytical review of all, without exception, censorship stories of N.V. Gogol’s works is presented. An objective picture of Gogol's relationship with the censorship is being recreated. The findings of the study allow, with good reason, to judge about the interference of censors in the writer's works in a fundamentally different way, in comparison with the ideas offered by literary criticism of the previous period without solid evidence. Based on a thorough analysis, involving numerous archival sources, the common, stereotypical opinions about the extremely negative role of censorship in Gogol’s fate are being revised. The most significant negative result among all censorship interventions in Gogol's works was the activity of the censor of Westernizing views, opposed to the government, a professor at St. Petersburg University, A.V. Nikitenko. It is the numerous reductions of Nikitenko, И.А. Виноградов. Произведения Н .В. Гоголя и цензура 255 a friend of V.G. Belinsky, in Gogol's religious and patriotic book “Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends” that the writer called “censorship murder”. No less significant was the intervention of the liberal censor in the texts of “Dead Souls”, “Theatrical Travel after the Presentation of a New Comedy” and other works of the writer. It is concluded that, with the exception of this “intrigue” against Gogol by the censor Nikitenko, on the whole Gogol's texts encountered relatively insignificant difficulties in censorship.

Highlights

  • The findings of the study allow, with good reason, to judge about the interference of censors in the writer's works in a fundamentally different way, in comparison with the ideas offered by literary criticism of the previous period without solid evidence

  • The most significant negative result among all censorship interventions in Gogol's works was the activity of the censor of Westernizing views, opposed to the government, a professor at St

  • It is the numerous reductions of Nikitenko, a friend of V.G

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Е. если бы ему не приходилось постоянно сообразовать свою деятельность с охранительными институтами общества и государства, тем не менее содержание гоголевских произведений, изучение сути взглядов Гоголя как христианского писателя, дают достаточные основания утверждать, что принципиального разлада между его мировоззрением и традиционной общественной и официальной идеологией не существовало. Особенность Гоголя — не только как создателя «Выбранных мест из переписки с друзьями», но и других произведений, — заключается в том, что своим содержанием его сочинения не только не являются противоправительственными, нуждающимися в охранительных, превентивных мерах, но, напротив, своим органичным соответствием важнейшим государственным интересам и установлениям Церкви очень часто обличали субъективный либерализм чиновника, занимавшего пост правительственного цензора.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.