Abstract
본 연구는 국내 외 가설기자재 관련 제도 및 기준 등을 비교 분석하여 가설기자재 안전인증제도 개선방안을 제시하며 건설 산업에서 사용 중인 가설기자재의 안전성을 확보하고자 한다. 현재 사용되는 가설기자재 안전인증제도 이행실태를 파악하기 위하여 생산 임대 사용의 가설기자재 관련 종사자에 대해 인터넷 설문조사 및 현장방문 인터뷰를 실시하여 통계분석을 수행하고 안전인증제도 실태조사 및 개선방안을 제시하였다. 안전인증제도는 2009년부터 시행되고 있지만 한국산업안전보건공단의 '건설중대재해 사례와 대책'을 확인하면 건설재해는 매년 증가하는 추세이다. 가설기자재 관련 종사자의 안전인증품목 적절성에 대한 응답은 '예(36%)', '아니오(30%)', '잘 모르겠음(35%)'으로 현행 안전인증제도 적합성에 대한 긍정적인 응답률이 절반에도 미치지 못하는 것을 알 수 있다. 현재의 가설기자재 안전인증제도는 건설 환경의 변화를 따라가지 못하고 있다는 의견이 많았다. 또한 국외 가설기자재 및 신소재 신제품에 대한 인증 방안 모색과 재사용가설기자재 자율등록제 제도 보완 및 안전성 증대 방안이 필요할 것으로 나타난다. 본 연구를 통하여 현행 안전인증제도의 인증대상 품목, 인증규격의 현실 적합성 및 인증방법 등을 검토한 후 안전인증제도 개선방향을 제시 하였다. In this study, the systems and standards for temporary equipment and materials established in domestic and foreign countries are examined to provide improvement schemes and to insure their safety. Statistical analyses of the data obtained from the internet and/or field visit surveys of employees working in manufacturing, leasing, and construction companies related to temporary equipment and materials and improvement schemes were conducted to evaluate the implementation of a safety certification system for currently used temporary equipment and materials. This safety certification system has been enforced since 2009, but the number of accidents at construction sites, which are reported by the 'serious accident cases and measures in construction sites' group of the Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency (KOSHA), has increased. The respondents' answers regarding the suitability of the items, which are required for the safety certification of the equipment and materials, were 'yes (36%)', 'no (30%)', and 'unknown (35%)'. Less than half of the answers regarding the current system were positive and most of the respondents answered that the current system does not reflect the evolution of the construction environment. A system is needed to approve items certified in foreign countries and newly developed materials and items, in addition to the (automatic) registration for the reuse of temporary equipment and materials, and improvements are needed in their safety. In this study, after examining the size and practicability of the items requiring approval from the current system, the certification methods are reevaluated and improvement schemes are provided for the system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.