Abstract
거풍구리광상은 트라이아스기 청산화강암 내에 발달된 NE 계열의 열극대를 충진한 2개조의 석영맥으로 구성된 열수맥상광상이다. 본 광상의 석영맥은 주로 괴상으로 산출되며 일부 정동 및 각력상 조직이 관찰되고 연장성은 500 m, 맥폭은 0.2에서 2.2 m 정도이다. 이들 석영맥의 광화작용은 hypogene 시기와 supergene 시기로 구분된다. Hypogene 시기의 광물은 견운모, 황철석, 석영, 녹니석 및 점토광물로 구성된 열수변질광물과 황철석, 유비철석, 자류철석, 백철석, 섬아연석, 황석석, 황동석 및 방연석으로 구성된 황화광물이 관찰된다. Supergene 시기에는 침철석이 생성되었다. 유체포유물 자료에 의하면, 광화시기 광석광물의 침전과 관련된 균일화온도와 염농도는 각각 <TEX>$163{\sim}356^{\circ}C$</TEX>, 0.2~7.2 wt.% NaCl 로서 광화유체가 천수의 혼입에 의한 냉각과 희석작용이 있었음을 지시한다. 황(<TEX>${\delta}^{34}S$</TEX>: 4.3~9.3‰)의 기원은 주로 화성기원과 일부 모암내의 황에서 유래된 것으로 해석된다. 산소 (<TEX>${\delta}^{18}O$</TEX>: 0.9~4.0‰)와 수소(<TEX>${\delta}D$</TEX>: -86~-69‰) 동위원소값의 자료로 볼 때, 이 광상의 광화유체는 마그마 기원 또는 천수 기원의 유체로 생각되며 광화작용이 진행됨에 따라 기원이 다른 천수의 혼입이 작용한 것으로 해석할 수 있다. The Geopung Cu deposit consists of two subparallel quartz veins that till the NE-trending fissures in Triassic Cheongsan granite. The quartz veins occur mainly massive with partially cavity and breccia. They can be followed along strike for about 500 m and varies in thickness from 0.2 to 2.2 m. Based on the mineralogy and paragenesis of veins, mineralization of quartz veins can be divided into hypogene and supergene stages. Hypogene stage is associated with hydrothermal alteration minerals such as sericite, pyrite, quartz, chlorite, clay minerals and sulfides such as pyrite, arsenopyrite, pyrrhotite, marcasite, sphalerite, stannite, chalcopyrite and galena. Supergene stage is composed of geothite. Fluid inclusion data from quartz indicate that homogenization temperatures and salinity of hypogene stage range from 163 to <TEX>$356^{\circ}C$</TEX> and from 0.2 to 7.2 wt.% eq. NaCl, respectively. They suggest that ore forming fluids were progressively cooled and diluted from mixing with meteoric water. Sulfur (<TEX>${\delta}^{34}S$</TEX>: 4.3~9.2‰) isotope composition indicates that ore sulfur was derived from mainly magmatic source although there is a partial derivation from the host rocks. The calculated oxygen (<TEX>${\delta}^{18}O$</TEX>: 0.9~4.0‰) and hydrogen (<TEX>${\delta}D$</TEX>: -86~-69‰) isotope compositions suggest that magmatic and meteoric ore fluids were equally important for the formation of the Geopung Cu deposit and then overlapped to some degree with another type of meteoric water during mineralization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
