Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the effect of peer feedback on idea generation in the writing process. To this end, we investigated how the number and type of middle school students’ peer feedback in the generating stage, and how the receiving and transmitting patterns of peer feedback affect the quality of the draft and the awareness of students’ activities. 176 middle school students participated in this study. Performing the book review writing task, they conducted peer feedback during the idea generation process, wrote the draft, and conducted a survey on peer feedback activities. Friendly feedback (based on the nature of feedback), content feedback (based on the feedback area), and commentary feedback (based on the content of feedback) accounted for the largest number, respectively. When classifying based on the content of feedback, the influence of receiving peer feedback was not significant for all feedback types. However, giving peer feedback yielded a significant influence for certain feedback content types. From these results, we found that the experience of peer feedback itself can have a significant effect on improving writing ability and that the act of responding to other people’s writing itself may expand the meta-perception of the writing process.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.