Abstract
The article discusses the court’s evaluation of expert opinions in civil cases. It is established that since the issues for which an expert is involved in case proceedings, are not within the court’s competence, the evaluation of the expert opinion should be motivated. In case of disagreement with the expert’s conclusions, the court should provide a justification based on additional or repeated expert examinations. The text discusses the legal status of prosecutors, state authorities, and local selfgovernment bodies entering civil cases to give their opinion. It also addresses the significance of their opinions for the court. It suggests considering the opinions of prosecutors, state authorities, and local self-government bodies as evidence in cases. It also suggests treating the opinions of representatives of legal science as expert opinions. It is recommended to engage state expert organizations in civil proceedings as expert organizations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
