Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the principles of distributive justice held by male and female fans of a Korean Professional Baseball League in allocating broadcasting rights revenues.<BR> Methods: A total of 380 participants from professional baseball fans responded to the survey questionnaire, which contained a scenario describing the allocation of broadcasting rights revenues to teams. The nine allocation principles listed under the scenario were: (a) equality of treatment, (b) equality of results, (c) equality of opportunity, (d) win-loss records, (e) spectator appeal, (f) effort, (g) need due to lack of resources, (h) need due to high operating costs, and (i) need to be competitively successful.<BR> Results: Results indicated significant differences in the perceived fairness of distribution principles based on gender. Specifically, males perceived equality-based principles such as equality of treatment and equality of results fairer than those of females, while females perceived equity-based principles such as win-loss records, spectator appeal and effort fairer than those of males. Results also indicated that win-loss records was identified as the most fair distribution principle among eight principles.<BR> Conclusion: The overall findings of this study would provide some meaningful information for the decision makers of professional sport leagues on how broadcasting rights revenues can fairly be allocated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.