Abstract
The study aims to determine the limits to applicability of rationality types in legal activity. The article broaches the issue of a form the truth of law takes and explains the idea that different legal professions are characterised as handling their own law image and essence. The research is novel in that it conducts a formal-typological analysis and provides a description of the main “cognitive positions” of the legal activity professional subjects. As a result of the study, all legal professions are classified according to the generalised features of a type of rationality they gravitate towards the most in their cognitive-practical activity: classical, non-classical and post-non-classical; the existing pluralism of legal understanding in practice is demonstrated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
