Abstract
Annotation. Introduction. According to the principles of the program-target method of budgeting, the diagnosis of budget efficiency of territories is the key goal of assessing the implementation of regional policy and improving the efficiency of budget funds, which, in turn, will not only determine the effectiveness of this process Therefore, assessing the level of budget efficiency of territories is a mandatory element of financial management at the local level. The purpose of the article is to study the methodological approaches of scientists to assess the budget efficiency of territories and on their basis the formation of the author’s directions of assessment of the object of study. Results. It is investigated that in recent years there have been positive trends in the socio-economic development of the state as a whole and its regions in particular, but still the development of individual regions remains asymmetric due to the inability of territories to accumulate the necessary financial resources to local budgets. places, which, in turn, does not contribute to providing appropriate conditions for the structural development of the regions. The existing methodological approaches are systematized, their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed and it is found that they are based on traditional methodological principles and provide for the analysis of absolute, relative indicators, integrated indices and rankings, etc.; do not have a single vision for a set of indicators; mainly focus on assessing the structure of the budget and the individual components of its revenue and expenditure parts. The necessity of improvement of a technique of diagnostics of budgetary efficiency of territories which will provide the analysis in the following directions is substantiated: the state of the budget; financial capacity of the budget; intergovernmental relations; financial independence; budget load; budgeting efficiency; budget management. Conclusions. The system of the formed directions will allow to estimate a level of budgetary efficiency of territories of Ukraine in the conditions of decentralization and to develop long-term budgetary strategy on places. Keywords: territory; methodical approaches; diagnostics; budget efficiency.
Highlights
Систематизація існуючих методичних підходів, аналіз їх переваг та недоліків дозволила обґрунтувати необхідність вдосконалення наявного набору показників та сформувати більш об’єктивну методику діагностики, що включає такі напрями оцінки як стан бюджету; фінансова спроможність бюджету; міжбюджетні відносини; фінансова самостійність; бюджетне навантаження; результативність бюджетування; бюджетний менеджмент
According to the principles of the program-target method of budgeting, the diagnosis of budget efficiency of territories is the key goal of assessing the implementation of regional policy and improving the efficiency of budget funds, which, in turn, will determine the effectiveness of this process assessing the level of budget efficiency of territories is a mandatory element of financial management at the local level
The purpose of the article is to study the methodological approaches of scientists to assess the budget efficiency of territories and on their basis the formation of the author's directions of assessment of the object of study
Summary
Систематизація існуючих методичних підходів, аналіз їх переваг та недоліків дозволила обґрунтувати необхідність вдосконалення наявного набору показників та сформувати більш об’єктивну методику діагностики, що включає такі напрями оцінки як стан бюджету; фінансова спроможність бюджету; міжбюджетні відносини; фінансова самостійність; бюджетне навантаження; результативність бюджетування; бюджетний менеджмент. Такий методичний підхід до діагностики дозволить комплексно оцінити рівень бюджетної ефективності територій України в умовах децентралізації і розробити довгострокову бюджетну стратегію на місцях. The purpose of the article is to study the methodological approaches of scientists to assess the budget efficiency of territories and on their basis the formation of the author's directions of assessment of the object of study
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.