Abstract
In jurisprudence there is a firm view on any norm as a compulsory , mandatory citation, which is backed by unlawful force. One ought not to assent to the opinion. The Constitution of the Russian Federation emphasizes the highest value of a person, his rights and freedoms. Rights and freedoms are directly applicable, governing import of the law, its purview, and administration. Legislative acts concerning rights and freedoms are out of narrow bounds of regulatory provisions. Failure to take this into account leads to mistakes in law-making and law enforcement. The necessity of distinguishing statement norm(fixing rights and freedoms) as an independent rule, along with prescription norm (fixing duties), is explained. In the article, their comparative analysis is made, the conclusion is generalized that none of the norms can claim to be a generic concept. They are types of the general concept of quot; legal norm quot.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
