Abstract
This study analyzed 122 research papers from the 1990’s, collecting the data by extracting certain topics of ‘Korean speaking’ and ‘speaking’. The paper draws the following conclusions. First, a new theory that fits the structure of Korean language is needed. Second, some teaching-learning methods that fit Korean grammar characteristics are needed. Third, instructional materials for presentations and textbooks for KFL need to be developed in association with teaching-learning methods and discussion class plans. Fourth, some practical education plans by language groups and Korean levels are needed. Fifth, some pragmatic education plans that are customized for students that love Korean songs (K-pop), plays, movies, dramas, musicals, public advertisement and so on are needed. Finally, a speaking test should be included on the TOPIK (Test of Proficiency in Korean).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
