Abstract
The article considers the perception of “radical orthodoxy”, in particular its conception of “cultural theology”, in the Orthodox thought. According to the author, Georges Florovsky’s conception of neo-patristic synthesis and certain conceptions associated with Palamism and onomatodoxy could serve as a basis to develop cultural theology within Orthodoxy. The researcher points out that Orthodox theologists’ cognitive style differs cardinally from western theological trends and argues that the term “orthodoxy” is irrelevant in relation to the “radical orthodoxy” trend. At the same time, the author shows that Orthodox theologists and radical orthodoxy face some common problems involving struggle with secularism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
