Abstract

성능중심의 건축재료설계 수행과정에서 어떤 성능에 대한 시험 방법이 복수 존재할 경우 최적 대안 선택에 필요한 시험방법 DB 기반구축의 일환으로, 인체충돌시 바닥의 안전성을 예로서 시험방법간의 연관성을 분석하였다. 8종류의 바닥시험체를 대상으로 EN 1177의 한계하강높이 시험과 JIS A 6519의 헤드모델 시험을 적용한 결과, 주로 바닥의 강성(쿠션) 크기에 따라 각 시험방법의 적용상 한계가 있다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 또한 시험을 통해 측정하는 물리량 단위가 같은 경우라도 시험방법간 연관성이 불분명한 상태에서는 각각의 물리량이 호환되지 않는다는 것을 알수 있었다. Since the study of building performance design was first undertaken by Building Research Station in 1930s, the results of such study has been reported from many parts of the world, building construction codes and standards have been revised based on performance in advanced nations as well in Korea, and various performance certification systems are in operation. The purpose of this study is to build a database of performance certification systems to investigate the co-relationship of various test methods related to the same test items. As test methods for case study, we selected test methods involving collision of the human body. Through analysis of Critical fall height test of EN 1177 and Head Model test of JIS A 6519 about 8 species of floor test-bodies, it was found that there are limits of application in terms of the depth and strength of cushion. Furthermore, although the measured physical parameters are the same, when the co-relationship between test methods is uncertain, the various physical parameters may not be compatible with the results.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.