Abstract
Based on the analysis of modern theories and practical approaches to local development management, the author determined that many successful strategies for community revival are based on the ability of society and business to self-organize at the local level. The author identifies the formation factors of local innovation archetypes and the resource base of innovation development of communities. One of the main aspects of the formation of local innovation archetypes is the development of mechanisms for the public choice of the innovation process priorities and their implementation, and creating tools for broad information support and promotion of innovative ideas to create success stories. It is determined that the main tasks of local community development practices are capacity building and community empowerment, the transformation of local residents from actors into actors, development of participatory democracy and involvement of residents in the development of the territory (enhanced participation). The author substantiates that regional (local) innovation landscapes are more suitable for developing complex interactions and capital formation of ties as competitive advantages. The territories are communities of economic interest and can take advantage of ties and joint activities of economic entities. Implicit knowledge (cooperation between educational institutions, research institutions, business, staff relocation, public-private sector interaction, technology diffusion, etc.) in the measurement of networks depend heavily on coordination and are necessary for various innovations. Based on the analysis of local development theories, it is substantiated that the most effective tool developing of local communities is to involve people in joint activities aimed at achieving the public good or benefit for all participants. Examples of the best world experience and practices in involving communities in solving local development issues are considered.
Highlights
За допомогою аналізу сучасних теорій і практичних підходів до управління місцевим розвитком визначено, що в основі ряду успішних стратегій відродження громад лежить здатність соціуму й бізнесу до самоорганізації на локальному рівні
The development of communities on an innovation basis and the construction of appropriate economic activity require the mobilization of efforts of all social structures, involvement in the learning process of all segments of society, recognition of the unique role of education and science for high-tech industries and for the traditional economy and daily life
We believe that the aspect of innovation development plays a dual role and in contrast to the traditional approach, which is often used in the development of territories, when the competitive advantages of traditional nature allows both to improve the quality of life and create conditions community development and relevant territory
Summary
За допомогою аналізу сучасних теорій і практичних підходів до управління місцевим розвитком визначено, що в основі ряду успішних стратегій відродження громад лежить здатність соціуму й бізнесу до самоорганізації на локальному рівні. Socio-cultural basis of communities innovation development локальних інноваційних архетипів і ресурсну базу інноваційного розвитку громад. The development of communities on an innovation basis and the construction of appropriate economic activity require the mobilization of efforts of all social structures, involvement in the learning process of all segments of society, recognition of the unique role of education and science for high-tech industries and for the traditional economy and daily life. If the qualities of the endogenous population can affect the acceptability of various forms of industrial development for the territory, taking into account these qualities is an essential condition for successful modernization in a particular social and cultural environment. In the study of Hall and Jones [3], the main factor of efficiency, which forms the leading cause of differences in the world level of economic development, is considered to be social infrastructure. The authors on the example of EU countries explain the differentiation of countries by institutional, infrastructural and economic conditions of innovation
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
