Abstract

The article is devoted to the application of the «language – communicant» model as one of the tools for linguoecological assessment of journalistic content. The research material was 15 longreads published in Russian electronic editions. It is concluded that the most dangerous tendencies for the environmental friendliness of virtual journalistic discourse are the abuse of terminology, the use of vernacular and jargon, the abundance of complex words, abbreviations and occasionalisms that need to be deciphered, the increase in the number of univerbated words, and the style diffuseness of the text. The abuse of such linguotoxic elements can lead to «disruptions» in mass communication and the emergence of communication difficulties between journalists and their readership.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.