Abstract

Donald Pizer’s personal retrospective also embraces history of American literary naturalism studies from the early1950s up to nowadays. From his earliest seminar in American literature D. Pizer was deeply drawn to the writers of the 1890s. As a student he was assured by the standard historical and critical studies of the period that naturalists had failed in this effort to apply a scientific accuracy and detachment to fictional representation, their novels were therefore both untrue and inept and naturalism was in effect a regrettable false step in the "development" of American literature. Since the 1960s being engaged in close study of the early naturalists — Norris, Crane, Garland, Dreiser — Pizer had to confront these conventional attitudes. When looked at closely as a fictional representation of beliefs about human nature and experience, the naturalistic novel appeared to be far more complex than it was believed to be. Pizer sought in a series of books and essays to describe and thus to redefine American naturalism as a whole. Rather than a mindless adoption and crude dramatization of deterministic formulas, he found in naturalistic fiction the conflict between old values and new experience, which usually resulted in a vital thematic ambivalence. It was this very ambivalence, rather than the certainties of the convinced determinist, which was the source of the fictional strength of the naturalistic novel of the period. There has been much recent interest in the American naturalist movement and its texts. It seems, as long as American writers respond deeply to the disparity between the ideal and the actual in our national experience, naturalism will remain one of the major means for the registering of this shock of discovery.

Highlights

  • Pizer was deeply drawn to the writers of the 1890s. As a student he was assured by the standard historical and critical studies of the period that naturalists had failed in this effort to apply a scientific accuracy and detachment to fictional representation, their novels were both untrue and inept and naturalism was in effect a regrettable false step in the "development" of American literature

  • Rather than a mindless adoption and crude dramatization of deterministic formulas, he found in naturalistic fiction the conflict between old values and new experience, which usually resulted in a vital thematic ambivalence. It was this very ambivalence, rather than the certainties of the convinced determinist, which was the source of the fictional strength of the naturalistic novel of the period

  • Однако на более поздних стадиях, как я отметил в работах «Американский натурализм: “усовершенствованная” версия» и «Драйзер и натуралистическая драма сознания» [Pizer 1991], натуралисты в духе тенденций, вектор которых задали идеи Уильяма Джеймса, стали искать более сложных и не таких прямолинейных форм для выражения своих мыслей

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Во-вторых, Леона Ховарда, на тот момент курировавшего почти все аспирантские работы по американской литературе в Калифорнийском университете в Лос-Анджелесе, интересовала прежде всего литература колониальной эпохи и периода до Гражданской войны. (Помню, каким откровением стало для меня эссе Марка Шорера «Прием как открытие» [Schorer 1948].) Поэтому, когда я сказал Ховарду, что многие мысли о природе и человеческом восприятии, выраженные Норрисом в «Спруте», знакомы мне по американским трансценденталистам, он поддержал мои изыскания в этом направлении, поскольку ему как специалисту по истории идей подобный подход был подсознательно близок.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call