Abstract

The article notes that while the institution of complicity in crime is externally stable, it has been significantly updated in terms of content. The balance of accessory and individual principles of complicity has changed, there has been a substantive narrowing of the scope of application of the institution of complicity in a crime (it has practically ceased to “work” in relation to sabotage, crimes of a terrorist and extremist nature), and there has been a certain regression in approaches to the legislative design of this institution.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.