범주형 전환문항을 포함하는 항목 무응답 대체 방법 비교

Abstract

In social surveys, unfolding bracket questions are used as a technique to reduce the loss of information due to nonresponse when item nonresponses occur. Item nonresponse, including unfolding bracket questions, has a similar structure to interval censored survival data. However, imputation methods to handle item nonresponses including unfolding bracket questions are limited. In this study, we examine performance of imputation with and without unfolding bracket questions. Also we compare three imputation methods to handle unfolding bracket questions. The First method is a linear regression-based nearest neighbor hotdeck imputation. Secondly, it is possible to consider a uniform distribution that selects a value with the same probability within the section for each individual. The third is an imputation method using the survival function estimated by the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation method. Hotdeck imputation was considered as an imputation for not using unfolding bracket questions. The performance of these imputation methods was evaluated through simulation and the KLoSA study is used to provide examples of the application of these methods to real data. Imputation methods using unfolding bracket questions showed better performance than the method without unfolding bracket questions. The performance of the imputation method using the survival function estimated by the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation method was better when the nonresponse rate was low and when the nonresponse rate is large in terms of root mean square error. When the non-response rate is large, the linear regression-based nearest neighbor hotdeck imputation method showed better results in terms of mean bias.