Abstract

The article is devoted to the relevant issue of chronotypology of 20th and 21st century art and its interpretation in the philosophical-aesthetical and musical-artistic scholarship. Considering the rapidly changing landscape of the contemporary humanitarian field, the author poses questions of reevaluation of both basic scholarly concepts and newly introduced concepts directed at the explanation of new and unusual phenomena of art. The work addresses itself to the concepts and utterances of well-known scholars (including Victor Bychkov, Nadezhda Mankovskaya, Yuri Kholopov, etc.), as well as presently active composers (Victor Ekimovsky, Vladimir Martynov, Anton Batagov, etc.). Special attention is paid to the discrepancies found in the interpretations of certain fundamental categories of art, which provide a general characterization of the present state of musicological knowledge. Questions of classification of the stages of artistic-aesthetical knowledge; questions of the lexicon of cultural and musical phenomena; questions of the methodology of studying new phenomena – this is the range of issues which require definition and endowment of terms, appearing during the process of the development of contemporary art. Keywords: musicology, chronotypology, avant-garde, modernism, postmodernism, postpostmodernism, metamodernism, aesthetics, lexicon of nonclassics, author.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call