ІНТЕРСУБ’ЄКТНА ВЗАЄМОДІЯ ЯК БАЛАНС СВОБОДИ ТА СТРУКТУРИ

Abstract

The intersubject interaction is analyzed in its broad and narrow interpretation within the article. Freedom and structure correlation in intersubject human interaction is investigated. Intersubject interaction is viewed as a space of mutual development and agental growth, which are explicated via the increase of activity, reflexivity, creativity and authorship. Intersubject interaction as a special form of human communication stimulates the agental rate of interaction participants to grow, which can result in the increase of creativity, responsibility and reflexivity. The developments of intersubject interaction as co-developmental relations may occur in acts of friendship, help, care, dialogue, listening to the others and so on. The concept of intersubjectness makes a clear display of exteriorized process of human development, which implements as a person’s communication with others. In other words, intersubject interaction is such interpersonal interactions type, which is the development in its process and results. The development of a person and his/her agental traits is performed within the intersubject interaction dynamics. The result of intersubject communication is the growth of the communication participants’ agency rate. The possibilities to correlate cultural-historical, existential, subject and deed-subject approaches are studied in relation to intersubject interaction. The possibility to include the concept of reflexion into the explanative model of human intersubject interaction is explored. It is argued that interaction becomes intersubject upon condition of openness in human relations. The results of pilot survey of the intersubject questionnaire by M.M. Nakonechna are presented. The intersubject questionnaire by M.M. Nakonechna is created for the psychological diagnostics of intersubjectness as an integral feature of human interaction that explicates in communicative skills, the tendency to communicate and to interact with others, positive emotions in communication process. The results showed the sufficient figures of the technique’s validity (Cronbach’s alpha α=0,777). The data is grouped according to the intersubjectness development levels (high, medium, low).