Abstract

The article considers the railway discourse of Ural travelogues of the late 19 th – early 20 th centuries. The main theoretical and methodological justification for this phenomenon was the understanding of the means of communication, in this case of the railway, as a message whose main content is “changing of the scale, speed or shape” (M. McLuhan) of human activity. One of the most important sociocultural changes caused by the railway was a new visuality, mediated by the high speed of movement. The train allowed contemporaries to see the world in a new way, becoming a sort of “а view”. A new configuration of space in which movement develops takes place under this view. Particularly, a rapid change of visual impressions triggers semiotization mechanisms, which allow one to regulate the kaleidoscope of the visual flow. As a result, the role of associative thinking, linked with the general poetic context, on the one hand, and the literary tradition of describing the Urals, on the other hand, increases. Another factor that influenced the perception of the Ural space during a railway journey is the intense kinesthetic sensations associated with the dynamics of mechanical motion. It can be said that railway travelogues formed for the Urals an organic style of description that suits the dynamic nature of the mountainous terrain. Moreover, railway travelogues re-structured the Ural landscape in a new way. The large mining centers of the Urals, connecting which was the main mission of the Ural railway, become the key points of the trip. The railway route, which presupposed the movement from one city-plant to another one, returned to the Urals the features of the mining power, having dimmed by the middle of the 19 th century.

Highlights

  • Елена Георгиевна Власова к. филол. н., доцент кафедры журналистики и массовых коммуникаций Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет

  • Маклюэна, «человеческие чувства, расширениями которых становятся все без исключения средства коммуникации, конфигурируют сознание и опыт каждого из нас» [там же: 26]

  • На протяжении достаточно длительного времени, в том числе в XIX в., травелоги оставались основным жанром литературного описания Урала

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Елена Георгиевна Власова к. филол. н., доцент кафедры журналистики и массовых коммуникаций Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет. Г. Урал из окна вагона: средства коммуникации и травелог // Вестник Пермского университета. Основным теоретико-методологическим обоснованием данного феномена послужило понимание средства коммуникации, в данном случае железной дороги, как сообщения, основным содержанием которого является «изменение масштаба, скорости или формы»

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.