رابطة شریعت اسلامی با شرایع قبل از آن

Abstract

In explaining the relationship between divine laws, assuming the divergence and equality of falsehood, and the existence of common and different rulings, it is assumed that the common rulings are due to a unified legislator, and the differences are not due to pluralism in divine laws or the abrogation of laws. Rather, the reality is that Shari'a is a unified truth, and the evolutionary process of legislation has led to some differences in it. The question is what are the commonalities of Islam with past laws, and why did prophethood end with the advent of the Prophet of Islam? It seems that in all divine and Abrahamic religions, there is a part that involves legislation or practical rulings, known as jurisprudence in Islam. This research uses a descriptive-analytical method and relies on library resources. The findings of the research show that fundamentally, there are no differences in the Shari'a of religions. All religions call upon humans to believe in the One God, reject polytheism, and recommend them to engage in righteous deeds and abstain from undesirable actions and thoughts. If any differences are observed, they are due to the capacities of humans in each era.