Abstract
The purpose of this scientific article is to identify the features of assessing the admissibility and reliability of forensic medical examinations as evidence, assessment of unacceptable and unreliable conclusions of an expert in judicial decisions. The authors give examples of unacceptable and unreliable expert opinions. Evaluation of reliability of expert conclusions includes checking the completeness of the conducted research, the correctness of the choice of the research methodology, and the methods themselves, the completeness of the conclusions drawn by the expert, the validity of the conclusions, and the completeness of the investigated objects. Assessment of the admissibility of an expert opinion includes inconsistency of the contents of the expert opinion with the current legislation; non-compliance with the established procedure of the examination; lack of appropriate qualification of the expert who conducted the examination; wrong choice of the object for research. The results of the study can be used by the investigative and judicial authorities in investigating and hearing of criminal cases.
Highlights
Целью научной статьи является выявление особенностей оценки допустимости и достоверности заключения судебно-медицинских экспертиз как вида доказательств, оценка недопустимых и недостоверных выводов эксперта в судебных решениях
Процессуальное законодательство Российской Федерации относит заключение эксперта к доказательствам по делам, на основании которых суд может принимать свои решения (ч. 2 ст. 74 и ч. 1 ст. 81 УПК РФ, ч. 1 ст. 55 и ст. 86 ГПК РФ, ч. 2 ст. 64 и ст. 86 АПК РФ, ч. 2 ст. 26.2 и ч.5, 6 ст. 26.4 КоАП РФ, ч. 2 ст. 59 и ст. 82 КАС РФ)
Starikova South Ural State Medical University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, The purpose of this scientific article is to identify the features of assessing the admissibility and reliability of forensic medical examinations as evidence, assessment of unacceptable and unreliable conclusions of an expert in judicial decisions
Summary
Целью научной статьи является выявление особенностей оценки допустимости и достоверности заключения судебно-медицинских экспертиз как вида доказательств, оценка недопустимых и недостоверных выводов эксперта в судебных решениях. Проведенное нами исследование показывает, что при производстве судебно-медицинских экспертиз эксперты допускают ошибки, которые исключают возможность использовать в доказывании данное ими заключение, поскольку нарушаются как требования допустимости заключения эксперта, так и требования достоверности.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Bulletin of the South Ural State University series "LAW"
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
