Abstract
The article presents the comparative assessment of efficiency and safety of neuraxial pain relief in labor. Subjects and methods . Four groups of 40 women in each group participated in the study: In Group 1, epidural analgesia was used for pain relief in labor, in Group 2, ultra-low-dose spinal analgesia was used, and paravertebral analgesia was used for pain relief in Group 3. And Control Group included 40 women with no pain relief in labor. The efficiency of analgesia in labor was monitored (scores by N.N. Rasstrigin and B.V. Shneider), as hemodynamic rates: heart rate, arterial tension, and median arterial tension (ATmed). Bromage scores were used for assessment of motor block. The changes in cervical dilatation and duration of the first and second period of the labor were assessed. All complications and negative effects of pain relief and impact of analgesia on the fetus were registered. Results. All methods of pain relief demonstrated statistically significant reduction of sensitivity to pain. Dilating pains were evaluated as 7.15 scores in Group 1; 6.88 scores in Group 2, and 7.43 in Group 3. In Control Group it made 3.87 scores (p < 0.001). During the second period of labor epidural and paravertebral analgesia was the most effective: 6.78 scores in Group 1 and 6.20 scores in Group 3 (p < 0.05). After pain relief in Groups 1, 2 and 3 there was a statistically significant reduction of specific peripheral vascular resistance, ATmed, reduction of cardiac index due to normalization of heart rate. In the groups with pain relief, the time from the development of analgesic effect until full dilation was statistically significantly shorter. The best result was achieved through paravertebral analgesia (27.5 minutes faster versus Control Group, p < 0.001). The statistically significant increase of active pushing phase was observed in Group 2, on the average for 6.1 minutes longer versus Control Group (p < 0.005). Conclusions. Neuraxial methods provide sufficient level of analgesia and are capable to manage labor abnormalities with no negative impact on the fetus. All represented methods of pain relief can be used for obstetric anesthesiology. In each specific obstetric situation, there is an option to choose the most appropriate method of pain relief.
Highlights
The article presents the comparative assessment of efficiency and safety of neuraxial pain relief in labor
Four groups of 40 women in each group participated in the study: In Group 1, epidural analgesia was used for pain relief in labor, in Group 2, ultra-low-dose spinal analgesia was used, and paravertebral analgesia was used for pain relief in Group 3
The best result was achieved through paravertebral analgesia (27.5 minutes faster versus Control Group, p < 0.001)
Summary
The article presents the comparative assessment of efficiency and safety of neuraxial pain relief in labor. Control Group included 40 women with no pain relief in labor. During the second period of labor epidural and paravertebral analgesia was the most effective: 6.78 scores in Group 1 and 6.20 scores in Group 3 (p < 0.05). In the groups with pain relief, the time from the development of analgesic effect until full dilation was statistically significantly shorter. Широкое применение эпидуральной анальгезии связано с тем, что этот метод наиболее изучен и по данным метаанализов Cochrane Database является наиболее эффективным [10, 14]. До сих пор остается предметом дискуссии влияние эпидуральной анальгезии на процесс родов, потужной период. Цель исследования: оценить эффективность нейроаксиальных методов обезболивания, их влияние на структуру и продолжительность родов и состояние плода. Выяснить есть ли альтернатива эпидуральной анальгезии для обезболивания самопроизвольных родов. Ведь сейчас как никогда актуален вопрос индивидуального подхода к пациенту, выбора оптимальной тактики ведения в конкретной акушерской ситуации с учетом особенностей роженицы
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.