Abstract

Alexander Griboyedov is a classic of Russian literature. His comedy Woe from Wit (1824) was a manifesto of freethinkers, and many of his friends took part in the Decembrist revolt (1825). In the USSR, Griboyedov was studied with a special interest – Soviet authors described him as a man who struggled for reformation of Russia like a Bolshevik. At the same time, comments concerning his biography and works were accompanied by ignoring and distortion of numerous facts which proved he was not a revolutionary. Nowadays, Griboyedov studies still depend on the hypotheses of the USSR times. That is why the revaluation of works published before 1992 is of particular importance – without taking a critical look at those it is impossible to cease mythologization of Griboyedov. The present article deals with the works of Arseniy Markevich, a historian and corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences. The subject of the study is the scholar’s view on Griboyedov’s Crimean journey of 1825. The report In Memory of A. S. Griboyedov… prepared by Markevich and presented in 1925 is one of the firsts works that focus on the writer’s visit to the peninsula. However, this material was not published. The article establishes a link between Markevich’s unpublished and consequently lost report and his essay Decembrists in Crimea that was translated into Ukrainian and published in 1930 under the title From the Cultural Past of Crimea. This translation is used to reconstruct the author’s conclusions concerning Griboyedov. It is analyzed in the light of the literature about the diplomat and writer known in the 1920s; its conformity to facts is determined based on the sources that may have been available to Markevich. The study establishes the historian’s attitude to revolution and, based on that, reconstructs the ideological orientation of the 1925 report. It also deals with the problem of place where the original essay Decembrists… was kept. Information indicating the main university of Crimea as such a location in the early 1990s is checked based on the analysis of the information source and evidence obtained from employees of the Scientific Library of the Taurida Academy of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Highlights

  • Сергей Сергеевич Минчик к. филол. н., доцент кафедры русской и зарубежной литературы Крымский федеральный университет им

  • Все это свидетельствует о парадоксальном отсутствии интереса к Маркевичу как к автору грибоедоведческих разысканий – при наличии зримого спроса на тональность его выводов в краеведении и СМИ эпохи СССР

  • Все это свидетельствует о парадоксальном отсутствии интереса к Маркевичу как к автору грибоедоведческих разысканий (обусловленную, видимо, трудностью восприятия «З культурноï минувшини...») – при наличии зримого спроса на тональность его выводов в краеведении и СМИ эпохи СССР

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Сергей Сергеевич Минчик к. филол. н., доцент кафедры русской и зарубежной литературы Крымский федеральный университет им. Что автор писал его по заданию Крымского центрального архивуправления вместе со статьей об истории землевладения на полуострове [ГАРК: 9]. Преподавал и автор публикации «З культурноï минувшини...» [Непомнящий 2005: 75– 89], доцент Широков должен был знать, какие именно автографы хранятся в библиотеке данного учреждения.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.