Abstract

In modern conditions, jurisprudence is very often confused with bureaucracy. This circumstance is due to the fact that everyone is accustomed to accurately and rigorously comply with each letter of the law and another, even not the most significant legal act in terms of legal force. At the same time, one has to face the fear of fulfilling this or that provision incorrectly, which leaves an imprint not only on the well-being of citizens, but also creates a certain negative tension when contacting public authorities, state or municipal institutions, etc. As a result, the law has turned from a means of resolving conflict situations and stabilizing relations in society into something that interferes with the life of an ordinary person. It seems that this happened because the “law for man” paradigm turned into “man for the law”. Such reflections prompted the author to try to formulate a theory of the correlation of subjects of law, which would determine the key positions of competent persons and bodies, not only within the framework of legal relations. Nevertheless, the latter continue to play the most significant value and will be considered in this work in more detail. The main conclusion is that the law should serve people, and not vice versa, for which, when creating it, it is necessary to take into account their real interests, what happens in life instead of modeling their behavior in the future, also using measures of state coercion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call