Abstract
В статье исследуется применение оснований реабилитации в уголовном процессе, правильное её толкование практикующими специалистами и, самое главное, различия между этими основаниями, раскрывается сущность оснований реабилитации через призму анализа действующих нормативных актов и судебной деятельности. Разработаны предложения и рекомендации по совершенствованию процессуального порядка оправдания невиновных лиц и восстановления их нарушенных прав. Кроме того, акцентируется внимание на поиске решений, с учетом того, что судебные исполнители допускают различные виды ошибок при дифференциации и применении оснований реабилитации в своей работе, и соответственно современная теория уголовного процесса вызывает некоторые противоречия в данной сфере.
Highlights
The institution of criminal termination has played an important role in the rapid and complete detection of crimes in the world, as well as in investigation of the criminal who committed crime, the compensation of property damage to the victim and the prosecution and rehabilitation of the innocent
DISCUSSION Article 83 оf the Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan sets out the grounds for rehabilitation, which serve to restore the violated rights of innocent persons in the criminal proceedure
It should be noted that, in contrast to other countries, the criminal procedural legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan separates the basics for rehabilitation from other grounds for termination of a criminal case and sets out a separate norm [1]
Summary
The institution of criminal termination has played an important role in the rapid and complete detection of crimes in the world, as well as in investigation of the criminal who committed crime, the compensation of property damage to the victim and the prosecution and rehabilitation of the innocent. Article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that: “Everyone charged with a criminal offense shall have the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense”[25]. Omission which did not constitute a penal offense, in accordance with the national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Ensuring the nonprosecution of innocent persons in the criminal-procedural terms serves to improve the legal mechanisms for compensation of damages to legal and physical persons (individuals) as a result of crime, the accurate and timely application of the basics of rehabilitation and the complete provision of abovementioned guarantees
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
