Abstract

The article deals with the historical and philosophical examination of the educational concepts by Plato and Fichte. The philosophers selected for comparative studies present a view of education as an engine of political changes, that`s why the article emphasizes philosophical explication of their positions. Plato’s and Fichte’s views on the problem of education are different as they both lived in different époques, but they were times of crisis. However, their loyalty to the societal ideal, the purpose of rethinking the value of education in the state, make it possible to compare their teachings. Education in Plato’s philosophy aims to change the state fundamentally, when education in Fichte’s philosophy contributes to its transformation. The specific pedagogical procedures established by both philosophers are in focus of this article and are important for understanding the relationship of philosophy and education. Thus, Plato proposes to divide pedagogical tasks in accordance with inequality of social estates, while Fichte considers education as a national project for civil society. The relevance of this problem stems from modern appeals to reform the education system depending on political and social problems, but philosophers approach this issue from а different point of view and it is important to trace the peculiarities of this approach in light of history of Philosophy.

Highlights

  • Актуальность данной проблемы проистекает из современных посылов к реформированию системы образования в зависимости от политических и общественных задач, однако подход философов отличается своеобразием, и важно проследить его нюансы в проекции истории философии. Procedures established by both philosophers are in focus of this article and are important for understanding the relationship of philosophy and education

  • Plato proposes to divide pedagogical tasks in accordance with inequality of social estates, while Fichte considers education as a national project for civil society. The relevance of this problem stems from modern appeals to reform the education system depending on political and social problems, but philosophers approach this issue from а different point of view and it is important to trace the peculiarities of this approach in light of history of Philosophy

  • Фихте рассматривает образование сквозь призму «индивидуального – всеобщего» как национальный проект воспитания нравственности для гражданского общества

Read more

Summary

Introduction

В. | Платон и Фихте: образование как двигатель политических перемен государство, то у Фихте образование способствует его реформированию. Платон предлагает разделить педагогические задачи в соответствии с разделением сословий, в то время как Фихте рассматривает образование как национальный проект для гражданского общества. Однако Платон сразу отмечает, что это два противоположных по сути стремления.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.