Abstract
The article examines the term “philosophical criticism”. The author points to the problems of periodization in consideration of critical articles written by philosophers of Russian religious-philosophical renaissance. It is shown that the terms “symbolist criticism” and “philosophical criticism” are in contradiction based on different understanding of the history of literature - calendar and constitutive-typological. It is emphasized that the criticism of Plekhanov and his epigones has every reason to claim the presence of a serious philosophical component, the term itself is therefore incorrect. The paper points to the most important feature of the method of literary text research, typical of Russian religious philosophers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
