Abstract
Peculiarities of a disciplinary misconduct as the actual basis for disciplinary responsibility are considered. The author draws attention to the fact that a disciplinary misconduct, unlike an offense, is usually not formalized, therefore, the sign of wrongfulness is not determinative for it. It is proved that in relation to disciplinary misconduct, the application of the principle of “nullum crimen sine lege” (there is no crime without law) is significantly limited.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
