Abstract
Today, the consumer of banking services is actually a weak party, being in a wide range of financial (banking) relations. Due to the different status of the parties, one being able to dictate their conditions in the legal relationship and the other having no real influence on the counterparty. One of the legal guarantees is the extension of the scope of contractual freedom also to bank deposit relations, account opening and servicing, credit relations, etc. Accordingly, the limitation inherent in the very nature of contractual freedom is an integral part of it. In this connection, the role of contractual freedom in the private and public legal sphere, which is characterized by the existence of State coercion, is of particular interest. The banking sector of the economy proves the existence of contractual freedom in organic unity with its limitations. A practical problem is the effect on the contractual freedom of public authority or a body authorized to administer justice. This creates an imbalance of interest in favor of public law against private law. The purpose of the article is to study the impact, place and role of the principle of freedom of contract at the stages of conclusion, modification and termination of contracts in the branch of banking services. The article examines the relations of the bank and its clients within the framework of such contractual types (types) which are distinguished by publicity in the sense of article 633 of the Ukrainian Civil Code: bank account contract, bank deposit contract. The author’s vision of the principle of freedom of contract through the dialectic of unity of contract freedom and its limitations is presented and justified. This approach is the basis for the study of bank-client relations. The conditions for limiting the principle of freedom of contract beyond the elements of the traditional triad in the banking sphere at the stages of conclusion, performance, modification and termination are also described. The article affirms the existence of limitations to the principle of freedom of contract not only by law but also by the principles of law (general and special), by contract, by the customs of business and by the activities of the State in the form of administrative and judicial measures.
Highlights
Досліджено відносини банку та його клієнтів у межах таких договірних типів, що відрізняються публічністю у розумінні ст. 633 ЦК України: договір банківського рахунка, договір банківського вкладу
Дослідження зумовило конкретні завдання, а саме: обґрунтувати ідею єдності свободи договору та її обмеження, екстраполюючи такий підхід у сферу банківських послуг; довести існування договірної свободи у приватноправовій і публічно-правовій сфері; описати умови обмеження елементів договірної свободи на стадіях укладення, виконання, зміни та припинення договорів банківського вкладу і банківського рахунка; сформулювати позицію щодо обмеження свободи договору у банківській сфері не тільки законодавчо, а й принципами права, договором, звичаями ділового обороту та діяльністю держави у вигляді адміністративних і судових заходів
Закомлистов та ін.), розглядаючи право як саму свободу чи як одну з форм її вираження; другого — розглядають право як міру свободи
Summary
LEGAL REGULATION OF ECONOMIC RELATIONS IN SPECIFICA REAS AND SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY. Державна установа «Інститут економіко-правових досліджень імені В.К.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
