Abstract

본 연구에서는 탄소 복합재와 알루미늄 2024-T3 단일겹침 체결부에 대해, 체결방법을 접착, 리벳, 리벳/접착 하이브리드의 세 가지로 변화시키면서 체결방법에 따른 파손하중과 파손모드를 실험을 통해 연구하였다. 세 가지 체결방법에 대해 각각 겹침길이 3가지와 적층순서 2가지, 총 82개의 시편을 제작하였다. 접착제는 FM73m, 리벳은 NAS9308-4-03을 사용하였다. 접착 체결과 하이브리드 체결에서는 겹침길이가 커짐에 따라 파손하중이 증가하였고, 리벳 체결에서는 겹침길이에 따른 파손하중 변화가 나타나지 않았다. 단순 접착 및 리벳 체결부에서는 적층순서에 따른 일관된 경향을 발견하기 어려운 반면, 하이브리드 체결부에서는 인접층의 적층각 차이가 작은 적층판을 사용한 체결부의 파손하중이 높게 나타났다. 접착 체결과 하이브리드 체결의 주된 파손모드는 층간분리이고 리벳 체결은 국부적 베어링 파손을 동반한 리벳 파손으로 나타났다. Strength and failure of composite-to-aluminum rivetted, bonded, and rivet/bonding hybrid single-lap joints were investigated by experiment. A total of 82 joint specimens were tested with 3 different overlap lengths and 2 types of stacking sequence. FM73m adhesive film and NAS9308-4-03 rivet were used for hybrid joints. While failure loads of the bonded and hybrid joints increased as the overlap length increased, failure loads of the rivetted joints were not affected by the overlap length. Effect of the stacking sequence was not remarkable in the simple bonded or rivetted joints. Failure loads of the hybrid joints, however, showed the maximum of 30% difference depending on the stacking sequence. Major failure mode of the bonded and hybrid joints was the delamination of the composite adherend and failure mode of riveted joints was the rivet failure with local bearing.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.