Abstract

The article touches upon the problem of distinguishing the concepts of “control” and “supervision”, draws atten-tion to the fact that despite the frequent use of these concepts both at the level of law and in the theory of law, nevertheless, there is no unity of understanding of the content of the listed definitions. Based on the study of regulatory legal acts, the positions of specialists in the field of administrative law, criteria were proposed that delimit control and supervision, their specific features were highlighted. It is noted that state supervision is a managerial category, the supervisory activity of the state, of course, correlates with control, but state administra-tive and supervisory activity has its own separate purpose. Attention is also drawn to the fact that in July 2021, the relevant law defines new principles of state control and supervision, such as: the principle of the rule of law, legality, transparency, legal order, objectivity, independence, justice, equality, responsibility. The authors con-clude that it is important and necessary to distinguish the definitions of “control” and “supervision”, and empha-size that the performance of functions of executive authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation is pos-sible only on the basis of the above principles.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call