Abstract
The author rethinks the role of criminal repression in regulating public relations. Turning to the topic of the re-establishment of the institution of an investigating judge in our country, the author urges not to idealize the historical experience of the genesis of this criminal procedure institute, but encourages further discussion not only among representatives of civil society, but also the scientific community. Conclusions. The results of the study support legislative initiatives in the field of criminal procedure. The author indicates promising directions for further scientific research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
