Abstract

The present article researches one of the crucial issues of the so-called “new-musicology,” namely, perceptions on the feminine nature, which defines both the philosophy of music and the overall political aspirations of feminist musicologists. The article demonstrates how the discourse of a woman is presented and constructed in the works of feminists: as a rule, through rejection of the masculine nature and opposition to it (which is subjected to criticism in the article). Also shown are the more general views of the feminists on the nature of the feminine and the masculine, disclosed on the levels of the conception and idea, as well as on the level of musical form and the musical text. The researchers mentioned in the article – representatives of feminism in music – include such figures as Susan MacClary, Mark Minough, Philip Brett and numerous others. Among the various critical utterances about the views of the feminists, the article demonstrates the critique of this tendency by Peter van den Toorn, who defends the positions intrinsic to the traditional views on musical aesthetics, in particular, the autonomous position of music, capable of being perceived “independently,” “by breaking through directly to the heart.” Concurring with the opinions of van den Toorn, the author of the article asserts his perceptions of the current polemics regarding the questions of feminism and music, calling upon Russian researchers to involve themselves in this polemics. Keywords: new musicology, feminism and music, MacClary, Peter van den Toorn.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call