Abstract

The article analyzes the classifications of economic growth factors proposed by Western and Russian scien-tists. In relation to each of them, the possibilities and restrictions accompanying its use are analyzed. It is em-phasized that M. Porter’s classification, despite its importance, is not without its shortcomings, including: the lack of analysis of the contribution of each of the identified factors to the situation of economic growth of socie-ty, applicability only to market-type economies, and attention only to the private sector. In addition, E.R. Salgiriev and colleagues’ classification is presented as an example of a general approach to the analysis of the nature of economic growth factors, which does not define the internal links between the elements. Due to the faulti-ness of the existing typologies, the author’s classification is presented, developed at the level of generalization of the available data, however, further specification of the selected groups of factors is assumed with the pos-sibility of creating their more detailed classifications. The value of a representative development is that it allows a deeper understanding of the social nature of economic growth factors and can serve as the basis for the creation of special technologies for its intensification.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.