Abstract

European scientific tradition distinguishes between modern and postmodern subcultural paradigms. Contrary to that, the issue of youth subcultural paradigms in Russian research tradition is still open. The specificity of the Russian subcultures is that they trace their origin either in Europe or the USA. In view of this, it is important to identify the features of European cultural phenomena that are present in the Russian cultural space. The European paradigm approach is introduced through the works of D. Hebdige and D. Muggleton. Paradigm features of subcultural analysis offered by these scholars provide the basis for analysis of the Russian empirical material. In particular, the study takes into account such characteristics as the presence / absence of a border between subcultures, the presence / absence of the ideology of a subculture, the fixity / fluidity of subcultural identity, the presence / absence of the influence of mass media on subcultural identity, the presence / absence of capitalist values in the subculture, the presence / lack of protest potential in subcultures. Interviews with representatives of the first and second waves of the Samara graffiti subculture became the empirical material of the study. We identified paradigmatic characteristics in the first and second waves of the subculture and compared them. The results obtained allow concluding that the Russian subcultural space has its own specifics, and the subcultural paradigms of both the first and second waves are of a hybrid nature, containing features of both modern and postmodern paradigms.

Highlights

  • It is important to identify the features of European cultural phenomena that are present in the Russian cultural space

  • Paradigm features of subcultural analysis offered by these scholars provide the basis for analysis of the Russian empirical material

  • Interviews with representatives of the first and second waves of the Samara graffiti subculture became the empirical material of the study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

В частности, в исследовании учитываются такие характеристики, как наличие/отсутствие границы между субкультурами, наличие/ отсутствие идеологии субкультуры, фиксированность/текучесть субкультурной идентичности, наличие/отсутствие влияния масс-медиа на субкультурную идентичность, наличие/отсутствие капиталистических ценностей в субкультуре, наличие/отсутствие протестного потенциала у субкультур. Результаты позволяют говорить о том, что российское субкультурное пространство обладает своей спецификой, а субкультурные парадигмы как первой, так и второй волны носят гибридный характер, заключая в себе черты одновременно модерновой и постмодерновой парадигм.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call