Abstract
This study analyzes the winning determinants for lawsuit cases in urban and housing redevelopment projects based on jurimetrics utilizing data mining methodologies of decision tree analysis and artificial neural networks. According to the decision tree analysis, for the prerequisite defensive process, it is noteworthy that ‘legal relation in the past’, ‘no cooperative membership or ownership’, and ‘no inherent authorization defect’ are significant in CHAID analysis, and ‘legal relation in the past’ and ‘no cooperative membership or ownership’ are significant in CRT analysis. The CRT analysis for the actual action shows that ‘defect in relation with articles of association’ and ‘no cooperative membership or ownership’ are substantial. The artificial neural network analysis shows that the variables of which importance of normalization is more than 50% are ‘legal relation in the past’, and ‘no cooperative membership status or ownership’ in the prerequisite defensive process. This study intends to help the urban and housing redevelopment projects participants predict the litigation results which can prevent unproductive legal disputes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.