Abstract

This paper presents the criteria for determining recovery priority that can improve the post-event resilience. Through case studies, it is checked whether the existing recovery strategy, which considers recovered capacity or connection with the main bus, works well even in extreme disaster. This paper proposes a new strategy that considers not only the recovered capacity but also the time required for recovery as a recovery strategy that can improve resilience. In addition, this paper proposes a new method to identify interrupted customers after a disaster. The proposed method can calculate the amount of power interrupted simply without iterative calculation or modification of the matrix representing the power system structure. The resilience results of the recovery priority according to each strategy were compared for the three IEEE test feeders, from the N-2 to the N-5 contingency.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.