Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide basic data for the development of defeat by observing in more detail changes and problems caused by the official approval of pilot competitions and seeking improvement directions based on the results of the study. In-depth interviews were conducted to achieve the purpose of this study. The nomadic sampling method, one of the non-probability sampling, was used. Due to the nature of the question, the interviewee selected three expert groups of five each for the demolition leader, demonstration major professor, and demolition player who are actually involved in the demolition. Based on this, changes were derived according to the pilot competition itemization, and the conclusions are as follows.First, a number of problems were derived through the comparison of the defeated informal and official competitions. Second, various problems such as specific technological development and regression, the risk of defeating women, and the qualifications of certified referees appeared in the current approval crushing competition. Therefore, it is judged that these problems should be improved.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
