Abstract
The article is devoted to the one of the most important problems in the history of museum studies, namely the state museum policy. Museums participate in the historical and cultural process, relying not only on the concepts and the objectives of academic disciplines, but on the public needs of a particular historical era and the influence of power structures as well. The purpose of the study is to analyze the influence of state ideological attitudes on the research works in the field of museum ethnography and on personal fates of employees of the Russian Museum Ethnographic Department in the 1920s and 1930s, using archival sources. The author introduces into scientific circulation previously classified directive documents which regulated museum activities during that period. Considerable attention is paid to the study of the museum employees’ field reports which give an indication of the shift in the methodological approach to ethnographic studies at the time. The paper involves personal archival documents which shed a light on the details of everyday life and lifestyle, the nature of relationships between people, determined by the political organization of society, among other things.The study leads to the conclusion that the powerful ideological pressure of the state that took place during those years negatively influenced not only ethnography and museology disciplines turning them into an instrument of socialist propaganda for a certain period of time, but led many ethnographers to tragic fate.
Highlights
ИСТОЧНИКИ И МАТЕРИАЛЫАРМ – Архив Русского музея. Ф. 70. Д. 586. Л. 65 об. АРЭМ – Архив Российского этнографического музея. Ф.2. Оп. 1. Д. 53, 289, 360, 572, 618, 619. Программа – Программа для собирания этнографических предметов. СПб., 1904. Петербургского филиала Архива РАН (ПФА РАН) – Санкт-Петербургский филиал Архива РАН. Ф. 135. Оп. 1. Д. 224; ОП. 2. Д. 146. Центрального государственного архива литературы и искусства (ЦГАЛИ) – Центральный государственный архив литературы и искусства. Ф. 282. Оп. 1. Д. 1, 4–7
Музеи участвуют в историко-культурном процессе, сообразуясь не только с концепциями, задачами научных дисциплин, но и с общественными запросами конкретной исторической эпохи, влиянием властных структур
В первые годы после Февральской революции 1971 г. наряду с коренной ломкой всех систем государственного управления в стране происходила реорганизация музейного дела, имевшая ряд положительных моментов
Summary
АРМ – Архив Русского музея. Ф. 70. Д. 586. Л. 65 об. АРЭМ – Архив Российского этнографического музея. Ф.2. Оп. 1. Д. 53, 289, 360, 572, 618, 619. Программа – Программа для собирания этнографических предметов. СПб., 1904. ПФА РАН – Санкт-Петербургский филиал Архива РАН. Ф. 135. Оп. 1. Д. 224; ОП. 2. Д. 146. ЦГАЛИ – Центральный государственный архив литературы и искусства. Ф. 282. Оп. 1. Д. 1, 4–7.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.