Abstract

In the process of analyzing the methods, numerous results were obtained. On the basis of which it can be concluded that the results of calculations carried out using the method of maximum likelihood became the closest to the actual values. However, it is important to note that these results turned out to be very close to the results obtained when determining the average value of the data set. The main advantage of this definition is ease of implementation. Since the experiments were conducted on the basis of a relatively small amount of initial data, it is impossible to consider that the determination of the average value is the most appropriate for its implementation. The conclusion is suggested that there is a need to conduct an analysis based on a larger amount of initial data. And also, using other methods of finding the most reliable energy balances. The possibility of constructing maximum likelihood graphs when assessing the quality of energy balance indicators and directions of possible use of this method in tasks were considered. References 4, figure, tables 5. Key words: energy efficiency, energy balance, fuel-energy balance, maximum probability estimation method, maximum likelihood method.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.