Abstract

The expected duration of a healthy life (hereinafter referred to as the life expectancy) estimates the number of years that a person is expected to live with good health. This concept is important to take into account the quality of life, not just its duration. Sullivan’s method of assessment of HPP combines data on mortality and health status. However, there are limitations such as subjectivity in the definition of “healthy”, data quality, and complexity of interpretation. Historically, the criterion of HPA has evolved, taking into account improvements in health and social conditions, including a more complete assessment of aspects of health and quality of life. Globally, there is a positive trend associated with the development of healthcare and medical technologies. There are differences in HPP between developed, developing and African countries. In Russia, there are also differences in health insurance by region related to socio-economic factors, access to medical care and lifestyle. Cities have a higher rate of HPP than rural areas and individual regions such as Siberia and the Caucasus. The analysis of the literature data revealed positive changes in healthy life expectancy in various countries. Japan, South Korea, the Scandinavian countries, Costa Rica, Iceland, Australia, Norway, and New Zealand showed significant increases in HDI associated with improved health care, socio-economic conditions, and health promotion programs. However, in Russia, problems such as health inequalities and health infrastructure constraints pose obstacles. Effective preventive measures, vaccinations, health promotion and lifestyle improvements are key factors in improving the world’s health. It is important to influence the social, economic and environmental aspects of health, strengthen health systems and promote healthy lifestyles for sustainable improvement of the HHS. Objective: to carry out a historical analysis, identify trends in the change of the GPI indicator and the main factors that contribute to the improvement of this indicator. Methods of work: critical analysis of scientific literature. Results: a review of the literature on the study of OPCW is conducted and the main factors of the change in OPCW are presented. Scope of application: proof of the need for the use of the indicator of the HPP. Summary conclusions: The analysis of global trends in HHS highlights the importance of continuous efforts to improve access to health care, socio-economic conditions, public health measures and lifestyle choices.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call