Abstract

The article analyzes emblematic discourse in Robert Burton’s The Anatomy of Melancholy, offering an extended view of the emblematics that organizes both the structure and the narrative of the book and is anticipated by the emblematic frontispiece. The article examines the book’s intricate structure in its connection with the generic uncertainty of the text. The singular vs universal dualism forms the book’s underpinning structure that implies emblematic and dialectic intentions of The Anatomy of Melancholy. The article further analyzes the emblematic frontispiece, revealing consistently explicated emblematic structures that emphasize the antithesis of “duplicity” vs “singularity” implicit in the book’s multi-level structure. Analysis further demonstrates the book’s continuity with cento- and florilegia traditions, also epitomized in the emblematic method. The essay argues that Burton was using discursive emblems and the emblematic discourse to establish his status as an artifex, which helps him avoid melancholy himself and encourage his reader to struggle with it. The article postulates that the emblematic frontispiece embodies the dialectic of “duplicity” and “singularity” and solves it by enabling the emblematic mechanism of reading of the book through the emblematic lenses, uniting the Word and the Image: it is what Burton eventually offers both himself and his reader to cure melancholy.

Highlights

  • The essay argues that Burton was using discursive emblems and the emblematic discourse to establish his status as an artifex, which helps him avoid melancholy himself and encourage his reader to struggle with it

  • В этом важном отношении «старшего» и «младшего» проецируется и манифестируется тот самый принцип метронома, на который эмблематически намекает визуальный маршрут фронтисписа: в самом начале книги, еще до встречи с текстом, он уже нарочито показывает, что читатель должен проделать настоящее путешествие через лабиринт меланхолии23 от Демокрита Старшего — «Демокрит послужит мне врачута же болезнь допускает разнообразие симптомов

Read more

Summary

Introduction

8 По сути, его рамка двойная: рамка фронтисписа и рамка книги самого Бёртона, что показывает его двойную роль как автора и персонажа, субъекта и объекта своего труда: «...как и Демокрит, заточенный в своем саду, трудится, чтобы обнаружить место меланхолии книгу закрытой, он тем самым указывает на столь важный для него двойной статус одновременного присутствия и отсутствия в «АМ», что он неоднократно подчеркивает: «omne meum, nihil meum» (это всё мое и не мое) [28, с.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.