Abstract

The article discusses the reasons that cast doubt on the beliefs about the impeccability of state lawmaking, carried out in logic: law — rights — freedom. Protests related to the “struggle of citizens for their rights and freedoms”, especially aggravated in connection with COVID-19, even began to pose a threat to the integrity of individual states. An example is the January events of 2022 that took place in the Republic of Kazakhstan. A retrospective analysis of ideas about the interdependence of influence that exists between civil society and the state made it possible to identify their main trends. In antiquity, the state regulation of the life of citizens of the policy was carried out in the logic: freedom — duties — rights. In the Roman Empire, the rationing of the life of the state and its citizens begins to take on a pronounced legalized format. The evolution of ideas in this format clearly demonstrates that in the future various kinds of natural law concepts are united in that any artificial social formation has no right to alienate the rights that are given to the individual by nature itself. Since that time, in the lawmaking of states, unconditional priority has been given to rights. In the teachings of representatives of German classical philosophy in the relationship between civil society and the state, a return to the importance of parity between duties and rights is still visible. Subsequently, the logic: law — rights — freedom became the defining attribute of the lawmaking of states that today are classified as legal. As a result, the functioning of civil society, directly or indirectly, came under their direct patronage

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.