Abstract
The effectiveness of judicial protection is largely determined by the efficiency of proof. Modern methods of studying the effectiveness of law and legal activity make it possible to analyze issues of the efficiency of proof. What is the efficiency of proof? Should the proof be effective? Is it necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence and for what? Can the efficiency of proof be assessed? How to evaluate and how to ensure such efficiency? What measures and procedural rules reduce costs and increase the efficiency of proof? The answers to these and many other questions are offered in the article, which also reveals the general theoretical and methodological aspects of the problem of the efficiency of proof. In conclusion of this paper the author puts forward the thesis based on the study that the very study and evaluation of the effectiveness of judicial proof allows to minimize its costs, to select the optimal cost-effective procedural means of achieving the goals of proof, to rationalize its procedural order. The study of the effectiveness of proof, thus, makes it possible to rationally choose the most effective and cost-effective alternative to build a procedural mechanism of proof.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
