ДЕЯКІ ПРОБЛЕМИ МОРФОЛОГІЇ У СВІТЛІ НАУКОВОЇ КОНЦЕПЦІЇ С. І. ДОРОШЕНКА

Abstract

The peculiarity of the diiepryslivnyk (participle) as a morphological unit of language generates scientific discussions, in particular, in the field of scientists’ constant attention there is a definition of its part-language affiliation. Linguists in their approaches to determine the place of the diiepryslivnyk in the morphological system of the Ukrainian language are divided into three groups. The first one is made up of those who consider the adverb to be the hybrid adverbial-verbal category, which is one of the forms of the verb, but has the potential to adverbialize. The second group includes those researchers who consider the diiepryslivnyk as a separate, independent part of the language that has features as verb and adverb, and their own semantic and grammatical marks. The third approach, common to modern grammatists, which include diiepryslivnyk to adverbs, regards it as a verbal adverb, emphasizing the verbaid character of this class of words. The aim of the article is to elucidate the views of Professor Doroshenko on this class of words. Speaking about the lexical meaning of the adverb, the scientist argues that although it has an verbal basis, but the meaning does not correspond to the verb, because it is transformed in accordance with its syntactic function - the procedural circumstance, and this is the specificity of the semantics of the diiepryslivnyk. Scientific research revealed the scientist’s original vision as for the syntactic, semantic, morphological and derivative features of the diiepryslivnyk, which gave the reason S. I. Doroshenko to support those linguists who speak in favor of giving the diiepryslivnyk the status of a separate part of speech.