Abstract
The article analyses the main features of modern arbitration of investment disputes between investors and investment-receiving states and argues that modern investment arbitration is strikingly different from the model that states had in mind when it was created. Investment arbitration has evolved from a private model of dispute resolution to a mechanism that is fully regulated by public international law due to the fact that investment arbitration is created on the basis of an international agreement and considers disputes concerning the obligations of States arising not from a contract, but from international treaties. The current state of investment arbitration requires a rethinking of the domestic doctrine regarding investment disputes and investment arbitrations in favour of recognising their public-law nature and its being at the intersection of public international law and constitutional law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
