نقد متن الحديث عند نور الدين عتر وصلاح الدين الأدلبي

Abstract

Some fabricated hadiths spread in an era after the Companions, therefore, the importance of hadith criticism was underestimated. Its provenance, and had a strong influence on the later and contemporary scholars in finding the text criticism, the two researchers identified his interest in the criticism of the text of the hadith and its comparison with the contemporary scholars, Nur al-Din Atar and Salah al-Din bin Ahmed al-Idlibi, aiming to know the criticism of the text with them, and a comparison between their methodologies. The researchers' approach in this research is a comparative study, where the researchers read several books related to this research, taking the opinions of scholars from the advanced and contemporary scholars, and then making a comparison between their approaches. Among the most important results are criteria for criticizing the text, including the criteria agreed upon: (1) contrary to the Qur’an, (2) contrary to hadith, (3) contrary to reason, sense, or history, and (4) that the text does not resemble the words of the prophecy, and includes risks and weaknesses. And Samajah. And there is no difference between Salah al-Din ibn Ahmad al-Adlbi and Nour al-Din Atar in the criticism of the text except in the easy measures, which are (1) in the methodology of Nour al-Din Atar, he mentioned the rickety, and in the methodology of al-Adlbi he mentioned its addition, which is the slander and the samajah. (2) In the methodology of Nur al-Din Atar, there is a criterion: “to search for the hadith, then there is no finding among its people from the chests of the narrators and the stomachs of the books, after the hadiths have been extrapolated and written down.” However, this criterion is not found with Al-Adlbi. The approach of Nur al-Din Atar There is a measure: collecting hadith by extrapolating the chapters, and this measure does not exist with al-Adlbi. The methodology of criticism of the text according to Nur al-Din Atar and Salah al-Din ibn Ahmad al-Adlabi are all in agreement with the methodology of criticism of the text according to the audience. Keywords: matn hadith, method, criticism of hadith.