Abstract

The main directions of improving the institution of procedural costs in criminal proceedings, designed to partially compensate for the burden on the federal budget, in terms of cross-sectoral unification for the formation of a unified regulatory framework, are investigated. Solved problem. Despite the close attention of the legislator and the higher courts to the relevant norms of law, their systematic interpretation and application still causes difficulties, overcoming which necessitates an in-depth and interdisciplinary analysis of this legal institution. It is proved that for the correct interpretation and implementation of the rules on procedural costs, the expansion of the practice of using this institution, as well as the minimization of judicial errors, it is necessary to form a unified regulatory framework for regulating legal relations. Research methods. The methods of comparative law, as well as general and special (analysis and synthesis, logical, special legal) are applied. Conclusion. The conclusion is presented that in order to form the normative unity of the institution of procedural costs, it is necessary to legislate the court’s authority to reduce the amount of procedural costs, the deadline for filing an application to the court for reimbursement of costs incurred, to extend the principles of cost allocation for all types of litigation, taking into account the differentiation of compensation and recovery mechanisms, to form uniform criteria for determining the amount for payment of expenses for representative.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call