Abstract
The question of participles on -n/-t, which in terms of the pledge category turn out to be marked members and in their morphological form constantly express a passive meaning, is considered. But the pledge in the Russian language is a morphological and syntactic category. It reflects the opposite both at the level of morphological forms and at the level of syntactic structures. From this position, the definition of collateral values is not scientifically justified only from the point of view of morphological features. The purpose of this article is to establish the differences between short forms of participles on -n/-t, which have a passive meaning, and short forms of participles on -n/-t, which have a static meaning. The materials of this article bring a certain theoretical significance to the category of the pledge of the Russian language.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
More From: Philological Sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
